How to Write Critiques in an Assignment?

The term critique can be defined as objectively analyzing an article. Critique is the process of evaluating an article thoroughly and analytically. There are many types of articles and content of varied tones and themes, and critical analysis of them is done in critique writing. However, most assignees simply provide a summary of the main points and neglect the fact that they are supposed to analyze and challenge the work instead. It should also be noted that the analysis is based on which aspect? And this includes facts and rational arguments that can be backed up with evidence and not just personal opinions. In essence, critiques in the assignment should exhibit your understanding and comprehension of the paper and the topic discussed. That should be irrespective of your personal opinions concerning whether the author has provided solid arguments or not. Writing critiques in the assignment includes three major pillars: read, analyze and then gather evidence.

In a nutshell, the parts of critiques in assignment writing comprise of following elements:

1. Introduction: The foremost step in critique Assignment Help Expert is to introduce the author and title of the work. The main points of the author should be given emphasis aided by the key takeaways. Further, the overall evaluation of the work should be stated along with background information for the reader.
2. Summary: This is the summary of the entire work or the major sections that one is critiquing. While writing the summary, one needs to act like a reporter, who is writing an objective and unbiased reportage of the author’s overall point provided by adequate support for that point.
3. Evaluation: This is where the transition occurs from being a reporter to being a judge. Like a judge for an assignment’s help, you need to look at all dimensions of the work, i.e., its weak and strong parts. The evaluation criteria in critique include accuracy of the information, presence or lack of definition of key terms, hidden assumptions, clarity of language, logic and organization, and common fallacies.

4. Response: While giving a response, you don’t need to be a reporter or a judge. You just need to be you by giving your evaluation and point of view on the work of the assignment. You need to ask some simple questions to yourself, such as: Where do I agree or disagree with? What ultimate virtue does this work have? Also, note that you are to respond to the work in a personal way that is backed up by sources and reasons.

5. Conclusion: In the ending part, the audience should be reminded of the overall importance of the topic. Personal rating along with personal response should be combined to put light upon overall strengths and weaknesses. And also, state what you believe is the absolute success of the work.

Now, do those things in that order and you’ll be having a clear and meaningful critique in Accounting Assignment Help Online.

Source:- Click Here